09-T13 Draft Minutes of the PL22.3 US TAG meeting {188th meeting since founding by ANSI/CBEMA as X3J3} May 7, 2009 Fairfax Inn by Marriott, Las Vegas, NV, USA The meeting was called to order by Van Snyder, International Representative, at 4:15PM. There were 7 people present. The attendees and the organizations they represent are listed in the table below as column 1. Stan Whitlock was appointed secretary for this meeting. 1. Opening business: 1a) Remarks from the chair Van Snyder welcomed everyone to the meeting. 1b) Adoption of agenda The motion to approve the agenda 09-T12 (attached) was made by Dan Nagle and seconded by Bill Long. The motion passed 7-0; the vote is recorded in the table below as column 2. The Final Agenda is appended to these minutes. 1c) Approval of Meeting 187 minutes (09-T11) The motion to approve the minutes 09-T11 of the US TAG of February 12, 2009, Las Vegas, NV, J3 meeting #188, was made by Dan Nagle and seconded by Craig Rasmussen. The motion passed 7-0; the vote is recorded in the table below as column 3. 1d) INCITS/OMC report Van Snyder had no INCITS business to report. As always, Van drew everyone's attention to the anti-trust guidelines at www.incits.org/inatrust.htm and the patent guidelines at http://www.incits.org/pat_slides.pdf . 1e) Comments from members None were recorded. 2. There was no old business. 3. Disapprove Corrigendum 4 with comment The motion 'PL22.3 US TAG votes no on Technical Corrigendum 4 for ISO/IEC 1539-1:2004, Programming Languages - Fortran, Ref. No. ISO/IEC 1539-1:2004/Cor.4:2009, with the following comments: 1. The change for Subclause 12.4 proposes to add a sentence to a constraint. The required condition cannot be checked by the processor. It should therefore be ordinary normative text. 2. The change for list item (11) in Subclause 16.5.6 uses the term "successful allocation of an ALLOCATE statement". This should be "successful execution of an ALLOCATE statement". If these two changes are made, PL22.3-USTAG will vote yes.' was made by Dan Nagle and seconded by Jeanne Martin. The motion passed 7-0; the vote is recorded in the table below as column 4. 4. There is no new business. 5. Closing business. 5a) Action items There are action items from this meeting: 1. Van Snyder will send the minutes to this meeting 09-T13 to Debbie Spittle at INCITS. 2. Van Snyder will send the ballot result to disapprove Corrigendum 4 with comment to Jennifer Garner at INCITS. 5b) Future Meetings The next scheduled US TAG meeting is planned for August, 2009. 5c) Comments from members No final comments from members were recorded. 6. Adjournment The motion to adjourn was made by Dan Nagle and seconded by Stan Whitlock; it passed 7-0; the vote is recorded in the table below as column 15. The meeting was adjourned at 4:18 PM. Table of votes taken by attendee ================================ 1 2 3 4 5 Organization represented Representative - - - - - ------------------------ -------------- Y Y Y Y Y Sun Microsystems, Inc Robert Corbett Y Y Y Y Y Cray Inc. Bill Long Y Y Y Y Y Self Jeanne Martin Y Y Y Y Y Self Dan Nagle Y Y Y Y Y Los Alamos National Craig Rasmussen Security Y Y Y Y Y Jet Propulsion Van Snyder Laboratory Y Y Y Y Y Intel Corporation Stan Whitlock 1 attendance 2 adoption of agenda 3 adoption of minutes of the previous US TAG meeting 4 motion to disapprove Corrigendum 4 with comment 5 motion to adjourn Final Agenda for PL22.3-USTAG Meeting 188 ========================================= 4:15-4:30 PM, Thursday 7 May 2009 1. Opening business V. Snyder Remarks from the chair V. Snyder Adoption of agenda V. Snyder Approval of Meeting 187 minutes (09-T11) V. Snyder INCITS/OMC report (if any) V. Snyder Comments from members 2. Old business (if any ) V. Snyder 3. Disapprove Corrigendum 4 with comment V. Snyder 4. New business (if any) V. Snyder 5. Closing business V. Snyder Review of action items (if any) V. Snyder Future Meetings V. Snyder Comments from members 6. Adjournment Motion: "PL22.3 US TAG votes no on Technical Corrigendum 4 for ISO/IEC 1539-1:2004, Programming Languages - Fortran, Ref. No. ISO/IEC 1539-1:2004/Cor.4:2009, with the following comments: The change for Subclause 12.4 proposes to add a sentence to a constraint. The required condition cannot be checked by the processor. It should therefore be ordinary normative text. The change for list item (11) in Subclause 16.5.6 uses the term "successful allocation of an ALLOCATE statement". This should be "successful execution of an ALLOCATE statement". If these two changes are made, PL22.3-USTAG will vote yes."