J3/01-181 To: J3 From: /interop Date: 21 March 2001 Subject: Unresolved issues 144, 177, 168 References: 01-168R1 Unresolved issue 144, p. 20, says that the usage of the term "link" is inconsistent. Unresolved issue 177, p. 405, complains about the glossary entry for "linked". Unresolved issue 168, p. 448, says that section C.9.2 may require revision in light of changes to 12.5.3 . Discussion: The complaint in issue 177 says that the language implies that there are two copies of a procedure, one in C and one in Fortran. But the edits in 01-168R1 make it clear that there is only one definition for a given procedure. In C parlance, there may be many declarations, but only one definition. Thus subgroup believes that the glossary entry for "linked" is fine as it stands. Issue 144 is resolved by an edit to clarify that two procedures are linked. The edit is to section 12.5.3. In reviewing the changes to 12.5.3, subgroup saw no need to change C.9.2 . Edits: Delete issue 144 [20:32-37] delete Clarify term "link" [270:13] change "linked with that C function or Fortran subprogram" to "linked with the procedure defined by that C function or Fortran subprogram" Delete issue 177 [405:33-38] delete Delete issue 168 [448:31-33] delete