J3/02-135 Date: February 20, 2002 To: J3 From: Dick Hendrickson Subject: Minor spelling and wording edits I ran a spell checker through the text version of the current 007 and here are the things it didn't like. Words are given in source text order without page and line numbers. Richard told me in a private communication that that was fine with him. He'd use a search and change editor option to fix them anyhow. Mostly I just cut and pasted the incorrect spelling here with no attempt to suggest a better spelling. Once I found the first instance of an error I stopped looking for that particular spelling. So, there might be many instances of "oject" in the text. In a few cases I added comments, generally for things that aren't pure spelling issues. 10.10Namelist in the table of contents 14.10Examples --no space after section number C12.10Bit Should "multipart" be hyphenated? incompatability struvtures occurance sucessful oject acessibility accessibity acording inkind in C525 dumy sucessful expresion In note 7.55 A (I, J) = A(I, J-1) + A(I,J+1) + A(I-1,J) + A(I+1, J) # # ^ ^ # I think we usually have a blank after the "," in subscripts In note 8.7 LEVEL=0 I think we usually have blanks on both side of the "=" sign; I have to admit I haven't been consistently looking for either of these things up til now. And as I look more, I think we are consistently inconsistent with how we add spaces to things. Unless Richard feels real ambitious you can ignore this comment. acess transferred choosen accommodate "sn" should be "an" in (8) just before 9.4 4 lines after C901 there is a "module module" occurred Page 192, line 1 (and the other DT routines). Is this correct? What does ST{...} mean? descritor INQURE Page 217, line 5 x1x1 => x1x2 Page 217, line 7, need a space between +- and signifies Page 217, line 27 ditto decriptors descritors Page 225, line 28, should "cr*c" be "r*c"? Note 11.2 names are arbitrary, but should we replace "ANALYSE" with ANALYZE" in 2 places? note 12.27 should "nonpredictable" be "unpredictable"? We get acussed of inventing enough new stuff. Page 262:24. Is (4) hosed up? What are the I16... things? Note 12.43, fifth line. Looks like the wrong kind of quotes to me. I think I complained about this for something else, so it might just be a fonting problem, or it might be a problem with the magic in going from Frame to LaTex. specifiy sucessfully Processor-depenent Maxloc example (ii) and (iii) there is a "the the" representat extra ta in first line of note 13.6; hard for me to see because of the line break In RANGE (iii) "teh" => "the" There is also an emIn in the example for selected_real_kind TINY also has a reference to both bemIn and emIn Is there a generic problem with "emin"? whenh 14.9.21, example "underflowed" => "underflow" I think it reads the same and uses correcter grammar inxeact interopability ASYNCRONOUS note 16.17 quote problem as above nnonpointer entit y asociated 11 ultimate component (4.5) : For a a !double a at end implementors should this be implementers ?? 1 END SUBROTUINE recignizable Page 433, example 2 19 END DO ! Nonlabeled DO inside a labeled DO Should that be Unlabeled DO? ditto for example 3 occuring 9 USE MY\_MODULE heirarchy polymophic construct entit, 403 ! in the glossary, I think this will go away by magic arithemetic seecharacter string