02-262 JOR Responses to 02-243 To: J3 From: Craig Dedo Date: August 14, 2002 Subject: JOR Responses to 02-243 Following are JOR responses to 02-243r1. 179:10. After ';' add 'if the stream or record file is unformatted,'. 198:20-21. Change 'The' to 'On input from a file connected for sequential or direct access, the' and move the sentence to make a new paragraph at line 24+. 200:16-17. Delete 'shall not process those derived-type list items as described in 9.5.2. Instead, it'. Do NOT make the following edit. 203:10-11. Change '(or some portion thereof)' to '(or a portion thereof if the type of the item is an extension of the type of <>)'. Reason: the existing language is correct as it is. Do NOT make the proposed technical change. 216:19-22 (TECHNICAL CHANGE). Replace by "If the output list in an INQUIRE statement contains an effective item that requires a user-defined derived-type input/output procedure as described in section 9.5.2, every effective item in the list shall have a defined value." Reason: This proposed change is too complicated for the time that we have available. 218:25-Note 9.64 Delete section 9.10.6. Do NOT do the following edit. 218:27. Delete ', or an input/output statement that references an external unit, '. Reason: Done in paper 02-234. Do NOT do the following edit. 218:28+. Change '7.1.8' to '(7.1.8)'. Reason: Done in paper 02-234. 219:1 Change "Restriction" to "Restrictions". Do NOT do the following edit. 219:25+. Delete NOTE 9.65. Miscellaneous edits [29:1] Change "commant" to "comment". References 02-007r2, Fortran 2000 Draft [End of J3 / 02-262]