J3/02-264 To: J3 From: Malcolm Cohen Subject: /DATA responses to 02-243r1 Date: 14th August 2002 [124:17] Change 'x_2 match those of d_2' to 'd_2 match the corresponding type parameters of x_2'. {x_2 may be an extension of d_2.} [124:36] Change 'x_1 and x_2 match those of d_1 and d_2' to 'd_1 and d_2 match the corresponding type parameters of x_1 and x_2'. [128:24-25] No. Current text is ok, suggested replacement is misleading. [141:18] Append " shall not be polymorphic, and". [141:21-25] Replace with "(3) The declared types of and shall conform as specified in Table 7.8." {NEW: Existing text is incorrect gobbledygook. Correct it.} {TECHNICAL CHANGE: It is ok for the to refer to something bigger - it just copies the common components in that case.} [143:13-14] Swap "" and "" and change "to" to "from". {Ditto.} [144:18] Change 'x_1 and x_2 match those of d_1 and d_2' to 'd_1 and d_2 match the corresponding type parameters of x_1 and x_2'. [163:10] After 'causes' add 'execution of its followed by'. {This is not strictly necessary, but is helpful clarification.} [164:3] Before "," insert "(16.3, 16.4.1.5)". {NEW: Forward reference the text which describes construct association fully.} [164:4] Delete "(8.1.4)". {NEW: Back reference to the immediately preceding 3rd-level subclause is unnecessary and unhelpful. The needed references are the ones to clause 16, inserted above.} [164:11+] (TECHNICAL CHANGE). Replace the note by "C810a (R822) If is not a named variable, => shall appear." {As the note previously said, this particular construction (omitting the associate name when the selector is not a simple name) is almost completely useless. In addition, the current text on page 165 does not work and making it work would make it very complicated.}