07-241 To: J3 From: Van Snyder Subject: Comments on Clause 10 Date: 2007 July 05 1. Edits w.r.t. 07-007r2 [274:18]------------------------------------------------------------------ Cannonball polishing: Replace C1004 "C1004 (R1005) A kind parameter shall not be specified for ." [275:23-25]--------------------------------------------------------------- Cannonball polishing: Replace C1008 and C1009 "C1008 (R1006) A kind parameter shall not be specified for the in the DT edit descriptor, or for , , , or ." [275:36]------------------------------------------------------------------ Cannonball polishing: Replace C1010 "C1004 (R1013) A kind parameter shall not be specified for ." [276:3]------------------------------------------------------------------- Cannonball polishing: Replace C1012 "C1012 (R1015) A kind parameter shall not be specified for ." [276:20]------------------------------------------------------------------ Cannonball polishing: Replace C1013 "C1013 (R1020) A kind parameter shall not be specified for the ." [279:31]------------------------------------------------------------------ Editor: Insert a comma after "numeric". [279:36]------------------------------------------------------------------ Editor: Delete the first comma. [279:41]------------------------------------------------------------------ Editor: Move "On input, has no effect." to the end of the paragraph at [280:11]. [282 Table 10.1]---------------------------------------------------------- Center the footnote in Table 10.1 for consistency with Tables 10.2 and 10.3. [282:1-2]----------------------------------------------------------------- What happens if the Ew.d format is used and |exp|>999? Editor: Replace "The edit ... 999" by "If the edit descriptor is of the form Ew.d or Dw.d and |exp|>999, the entire field is filled with asterisks". [285:8]------------------------------------------------------------------- Editor: Replace "m" by "". [289:24]------------------------------------------------------------------ Editor: Insert "character" before "position" for consistency with [289:21] (or delete the first "character" at [289:21]). [291:29-30]--------------------------------------------------------------- Editor: Replace "list-directed" by "list-directed or namelist". Them move the sentence "If the mode ... in place of a comma." to [278:10]. It's irrelevant to list-directed input/output here, and has nothing to do with format-directed editing. [294:9, 297:33]----------------------------------------------------------- Dosn't work if the last nonblank character before the slash is a value separator. Editor: Insert ", if any" after "previous value" in both places. ========================================================================== 2. Questions without answers or edits [280:22-32]--------------------------------------------------------------- Suppose the format is F7.4. How is the input " 1e-6"interpreted? There's no decimal symbol. Is it .0001e-6 or 1.0e-6 or .1e-6? [285:10-11]--------------------------------------------------------------- In light of [68:21-22], do we need "The lower-case ... digits ... upper-case ... digits."? If we must keep it, move it to [285:18+}. [286 Note 10.17]---------------------------------------------------------- I thought we decided at meeting 180 that Note 10.17 is meaningless. [289:33]------------------------------------------------------------------ What if there is no such record? I suspect it's created on output. On input, is it an error condition? [300-301]----------------------------------------------------------------- 10.11.4 doesn't specify that a name=value subsequence is generated for every namelist group object, or the order of the name=value subsequences.