To: J3 08-105r1 From: Stan Whitlock/Van Snyder Subject: Annex A, UTI 134 Date: 2008 February 12 1.0 Edits to be acted upon [503:9-10]-------------------------------------------------------------- Editor: Replace "The ability ... variable" by "In {\sc Fortran} 77 and Fortran 90, a DO variable was allowed" Then insert "; this" before "has been". [503:14]---------------------------------------------------------------- Editor: Delete the comma after "77" and delete "for consistency also in" [503:19]---------------------------------------------------------------- Editor: Delete the comma after "77" and delete "for consistency also in" [503:24]---------------------------------------------------------------- Editor: Replace "and also for consistency in" by ", and" [503:30]---------------------------------------------------------------- Editor: Delete the comma after "77" and delete "for consistency also in" [503:34]---------------------------------------------------------------- Editor: Insert "{\sc Fortran} 66," after "In" and replace "and also for consistency in Fortran 90" by "Fortran 90, and Fortran 95" [503:38+1-3]------------------------------------------------------------ Editor: Delete UTI 134 [504:7]----------------------------------------------------------------- The features are not part of the current standard. Editor: Replace "work" by "worked" [505:3]----------------------------------------------------------------- Computed GO TO is reasonably efficient, and no less efficient than a CASE construct. Editor: Replace "more efficient" by "clearer" [505:10-11]------------------------------------------------------------- Editor: Replace "of FORTRAN ... allowed" by "allow" since the same "problem" exists in Fortran 2008. [505:12]---------------------------------------------------------------- Editor: Insert a comma after "unnecessary". [505:29]---------------------------------------------------------------- Editor: Replace the line "Fortran 90 had ... The" by "In addition to the CHARACTER* form introduced in {\sc Fortran} 77, Fortran 90 provided the CHARACTER([LEN=]) form. The" [505:32]---------------------------------------------------------------- Editor: Replace "allowed" by "allow" since the "problem" persists. [505:34]---------------------------------------------------------------- Editor: Insert "usually" after "can" 2.0 Edits that will not be acted upon [505:35+]--------------------------------------------------------------- Editor: Insert a note "In most cases the proposed solution is adequate, but it is not thread safe."