J3/02-239 Date: July 22, 2002 To: J3 From: Rob James Subject: Minor edits This paper will attempt to correct (or at least point out) a few typos, formatting errors, and other minor inaccuracies in 02-007r2. Edits: [73:16+] In note 5.5, "-9999" has an extra "-". I assume this is due to an incorrect TeXism. Change: "--9999" => "-9999". [194:10+] In note 9.34, there is a formatting problem. The comment "! Allowed if no two elements" is split up onto two lines. The following three edits are to correct something that went wrong between 02-007 and 02-007r1. I assume that it was an attempt to correct the references in 02-007 to list items "(2)(2a)" and "(2)(2b)", but somehow list item (2) itself got merged with list item (1). [205:14] This should be the start of list item (2). Add "(2)" to this line similar to "(1)" at [205:8] (using whatever necessary TeXism). [205:17] Change "(1a)" => "(2a)". This was the original meaning according to 02-007. [205:21] Change "(1a)" => "(2a)" and "(1b)" => "(2b)". Again, this was the original meaning in 02-007. [523] Formatting problem: The headings "Annex E" and "(Informative)" run together vertically. I don't know the necessary TeXisms to fix this, so I'll leave it to the editor. [524] The index entry for the ASSOCIATE construct is misspelled. Change: "ASOCIATE construct" => "ASSOCIATE construct" ------ END OF PAPER ------ Rob James XL Fortran Compiler Developer IBM Toronto Lab Phone: 905-413-6043 E-mail: rbjames@ca.ibm.com