To: J3 07-326 From: Bill Long Subject: BOZ literal constants Date: 2007 October 30 References: J3/07-007r3, N1695 Discussion By lumping the description of BOZ literal constants into the subclause on the Integer type, old versions of the standard had been misinterpreted to imply that BOZ literal constants actual had a type and were type Integer. This is clearly not the case, and this confusion was fixed by the BITS feature. When the bits type was removed, this fix was also removed. Edits are provided below to avoid the confusion. An edit is also provided to allow BOZ literal constants in more places, as described in N1695. Edits to 07-007r3: [56:15-] End subclause 4.4.2 Integer type after Note 4.6 and insert the following to start a new subclause: "4.4.2a BOZ literal constants A binary, octal, and hexadecimal, or BOZ, constant represents an ordered sequence of bits." [57:3] Delete the sentence "Binary, octal, ... number systems". [57:5] At the end of the paragraph, add a new sentence: "Each digit of a binary constant represents one bit, each digit of an octal constant represents three bits, and each hex digit of a hex constant represents four bits, according to their numerical representations a binary integers, with leading zero bits where needed." [57:6-9] Replace the constraint with: "C414 (R412) A shall appear only as a in a DATA statement, or as an actual argument associated with the dummy argument of an intrinsic procedure as specified in (13)."