12-105r1 To: J3 From: Malcolm Cohen Subject: Editorial Stuff Date: 2012 February 13 1. Introduction This paper accepts some of the editorial changes suggested in 12-105 and rejects others. With regards to cross-references, the policy is not to insert these when it is clear or nearby. A cross-reference breaks up the flow of the prose; this has a negative effect on comprehension and visual searchability. 2. Edits to 10-007r1 Index "label" as "see statement label" instead of having a separate list of pages. [44:22] 3.2.5p3, After "Any statement may", "have" -> "begin with". {A statement label is at the beginning of a statement, but the statement might "have" other labels inside it.} [46:29] 3.3.2.6p1, index "statement label" here. {Placement of statement labels in free form is important information.} [47:24] 3.3.3.5p1, index "statement label" here. {Placement of statement labels in fixed form is important information.} [105:41] 5.4.7p9 After "data-pointer-initialization compatible" insert "(4.5.4.6)" viz "(\ref{Default initialization for components})". {This horrible term is indexed, but since we are some distance away and it is important to the sentence, a cross-reference is useful.} [150:17-18] 7.1.11p2(17), if it will fit on the line, "contai-ning"->"contain-ing". {LaTeX's auto-hyphenation is sometimes worse than useless.} 3. Rejected edits [44:22] Insert cross references ... to make it easier to find where label declarations appear. {This is clear enough as is, it is not needed here.} [66:32] 4.5.4 C446, Insert a cross reference for "specification function (7.1.11)" or make it a hot link. {That is unnecessary and would inappropriately draw attention to a minor aspect of the constraint.} [66:41] 4.5.4 C450, Insert a cross reference for "specification function (7.1.11)" or make it a hot link. {That is unnecessary and would inappropriately draw attention to a minor aspect of the constraint.} [70:1] C460, After "data-pointer-initialization compatible" Insert "(4.5.4.6)". {It is completely inappropriate to insert a cross-reference from one subclause to itself.} [151:27] 7.1.12p1(4), Insert a cross ref for "specification inquiry" or make it a hot link. {No. It refers to the previous subclause and is clearly to do with specification expressions (that subclause). It is also indexed.} ===END===