J3/14-153 To: J3 From: Van Snyder Subject: More editorial stuff Date: 2014 May 19 Edits with respect to 14-007 ---------------------------- [206:24+4,24+8 Note 9.15] Replace "associated with" with "connected to" thrice. {Units are "connected to" files or devices, not "associated with" them.} [301:26 12.5.2.10] Replace "associated with" with "corresponding to". {There is no concept of argument association for alternate return specifiers.} [403:30 13.8.2.16p1] Delete "It does not have the BIND attribute, and is not a sequence type." {This is implied by the type LOCK_TYPE being extensible.} [464:26 16.6.8p1, fourth item] Replace "associated" with "corresponding". {Correspondence is a syntactic context; association is not. If the actual argument is an optional dummy argument, it might be absent at run time, and therefore not argument associated.} [465:10 A.1p1] Replace "associated" with "corresponding". {For consistency with [465:12].} Observations that might need action ----------------------------------- Is a collating sequence "associated with" a character kind? [340:33 13.7.35p3] Replace "associated with" with "for". [341:3 13.7.35p5] Replace "associated with" with "for". [358:29 13.7.77p5] Replace "associated with" with "for". Is an exception "associated" with a flag? [409:27 14.3p2] Replace "associated" with "related"? Are specification statements "associated" with a common block? [503:36 C.8.3p1] Replace "associated" with "related"?