To: J3 Members J3/16-268 From: Van Snyder Subject: Comments arising from Editor's report References: 16-007r2 16-243 Date: 2016 September 30 [16:33 3.100.1] The editor suggests a subclause about argument correspondence is a better cross reference than a syntax rule. Replace "(R1524)" with "(15.5.2.1") \ref{D15:Argument correspondence}. [16:36 3.100.2] The editor suggests a subclause about structure constructors is a better cross reference than a syntax rule. Replace "(R757)" with "(7.5.10") \ref{D7:Construction of derived-type values}. [140:15-18 9.7.1.1p6 141:9-15] The editor suggests the description of an error condition that arises because a nondeferred type parameter of an allocate object differs from the corresponding value of ought more properly be described under 9.7.1.2 "Execution of an ALLOCATE statement". Perhaps all of 9.7.1.1p6 ought to be in 9.7.1.2p8. Editor's choice whether to do anything. [164:15-16 10.1.11p2(5)] After deleting a list item very similar to (5) the editor observed that item (6) could also be deleted. They both refer to an object accessible by host association within a BLOCK construct. Delete 10.1.11p2(5).