02-263r1 JOR Responses to 02-209 To: J3 From: Craig Dedo Date: August 15, 2002 Subject: JOR Responses to 02-209 Following are the JOR responses to the concerns raised in 02-209. Edits are with respect to 02-007r2. Fixes to issues raised regarding 02-181r4. [209:15,16] Change "processor-specified" to "processor- dependent" in two places. [209:16] Change "and to a" to "or to a". [209:17] Delete "the flush operation had no effect or that". Fixes to issues raised regarding 02-197. [204:1 ] Delete the second sentence in Note 9.46. Fixes to issues raised regarding 02-199. [13:3] Replace with "2.2.3.4 Interface block". [13:4-5] Replace "a procedure interface. The name of an interface body may be used to specify" with "an abstract interface or". [13:7] Replace "either a specific interface block or" with "a specific interface block, an abstract interface, or". [13:8] Delete "simply". Fixes to issues raised regarding 02-203r2. [43:16+] Change Note 4.18 to read, "Since a type parameter is not an object, a bound for an explicit-shape-spec or a type- param-value may contain a type-param-name. " [251:1-2] Replace "A procedure ... of the module;" with "If a procedure declared in the scoping unit of a module has an implicit interface, it shall explicitly be given the EXTERNAL attribute in that scoping unit;". [251:4-5] Replace "An intrinsic ... module" with "If an intrinsic procedure is declared in the scoping unit of a module, it shall explicitly be given the INTRINSIC attribute in that scoping unit". [343:35-36] Change the first sentence of the paragraph to read, "Result Value. If P or R is absent, the result value is the same as if it were present with the value zero." [334:33] Replace "The optional argument" with "MOLD". References 02-007r2, Fortran 2000 Draft [End of J3 / 02-263r1]