J3/06-205r1 Date: August 16, 2006 Subject: Ultimate components From: Dick Hendrickson It seems that the definition of ultimate components only extends to a depth of two. Should "ultimate components of the components" at [56:9] by "components of the ultimate components"? Answer: No. The definition of ultimate components extends all the way to the leaves of the derived type. The phrase that begins "plus the ultimate components..." recurses.