07-293r2 To: J3 From: Van Snyder Subject: UTI 123 Date: 2007 November 13 1. Introduction The term "subcomponent" is wrong at [482:1] and [483:3]: type :: t1 type(t2), pointer :: C => W ... type :: t2 real, pointer :: X => Z ... real, save :: Z type(t2), save :: W type(t1), pointer :: A nullify ( w%x ) allocate ( a ) ! ought not to change the association status of w%x deallocate ( a ) ! ought not to change the association status of a%c%x ! Assuming the dummy argument of Sub has INTENT(OUT) and a%c is ! associated, call sub ( a ) ! ought not to change the association status of a%c%x 2. Edits w.r.t. 07-007r3 [482:1,483:3]------------------------------------------------------------- Editor: Replace "subcomponent" by "direct component" at both places.