To: J3 Members J3/16-263 From: Van Snyder Subject: Trivial syntactic sugar (feature creep) in CHANGE TEAM References: 16-007r2 Date: 2016 September 28 1. Proposal ----------- It is simple and useful to include the functionality of the ASSOCIATE construct in the CHANGE TEAM construct. 2. Edits -------- [185:9 R1112] Replace "" with " <> <> " [185:25 C1117+] Maybe insert a constraint: "C1117a (R1113a) A in an shall not be a coindexed object." {This constrains against the same functionality that TEAM in an provides, but doing it here means you needn't write it there. Don't insert the constraint if it's not clearly harmful to allow it.} [186:4+ 11.1.5.1p2] Insert a paragraph: "Each in an in the CHANGE TEAM statement is an associate name that is associated with its corresponding selector in the same way as in an ASSOCIATE construct (11.1.3.2)." If constraint C1117a suggested above is not included, append a sentence to this paragraph: "If the in an is a coindexed object, the meaning of its is interpreted in the parent team; the effect of the CHANGE TEAM construct does not change its interpretation."